Health

Can Celebrities Solve Our Fertility Crisis?

When supermodel Barbara Palvin stepped onto the red carpet at Cannes, glowing in a blue gown that draped perfectly over her baby bump, the photos went viral.

By Lisa Britton3 min read
Getty/Andreas Rentz

She was visibly in love with the life growing inside her and standing proudly beside her husband. Around the same time, Taylor Swift’s engagement and the lead-up to her wedding with Travis Kelce sent a different kind of ripple through young women: Maybe commitment and building something real is worth it after all.

These moments feel bigger than celebrity gossip. They tap into something millions of women quietly long for but rarely see modeled these days. New research from the Institute for Family Studies’ 2026 State of Fertility Report suggests that what celebrities do with their own families actually moves the needle on what the rest of us want for ours.

The report presents a dark picture of where America stands. Our total fertility rate has dropped below 1.6 children per woman, far under the 2.1 replacement level. Fresh historical data compiled for every state back to 1917 shows we’re now in our third extended period of below-replacement fertility. This one is longer, deeper, and more geographically widespread than the ones during the Great Depression or the 1970s/80s.

If current trends hold, US population peaks around 351 million and begins declining in the 2050s. The authors, Lyman Stone and Peter Foreshaw Brookes, call it “The Demographic Dead End.”

But Americans haven’t stopped wanting children. The report shows desired family size holding at around 2.4 children. The gap between what we say we want and what we’re actually having is the widest it’s been in decades.

The Hidden Power of Who We Admire

The IFS team didn’t stop at national statistics. They had the 2026 State of Family Culture Survey with nearly 4,800 Americans ages 18–50. One section asked respondents to name a public figure they most admire. Researchers then looked up how many children those admired people have.

Evie Magazine Ad UnitEvie Magazine Ad Unit

The result was interesting: each additional child born to an admired celebrity is associated with an increase in children in the respondent’s own desired family size. That effect was roughly as large as the impact of having one more sibling growing up! 

Among respondents under 30, desired number of children rises steadily as the admired public figure’s family size increases—from about 2.1 children when the celebrity has none, climbing toward 2.6–3.0 when the celebrity has a higher number of kids.

Celebrity family size shapes desires almost as much as our own family. Pop culture isn’t just background noise that doesn’t affect us. It's actively guiding us toward what feels normal and desirable.

Celebrity family size shapes desires almost as much as our own family.

In recent years, celebrities and influencers told us a different story: “You don’t need a man!” Single motherhood framed as the ultimate empowerment. Career-first, kids-optional, marriage-optional. 

I’ve called this out before with stars like Mindy Kaling, whose messaging around raising children without a present father felt tone-deaf to the millions of young women without her resources or safety net. (Her team later clarified that her own father remained involved as a father figure, but the initial framing had already landed with her audience.)

The narratives didn’t create the fertility decline by themselves, but they reinforced it. When the women that young girls look up to treat marriage and fatherhood as optional (or even worse, obstacles), something shifts in the collective imagination. The data now shows the cost: millions of women ending up with fewer children than they actually wanted, or none at all.

Evie Magazine Ad UnitEvie Magazine Ad Unit

The IFS report doesn’t just diagnose the problem, though; it points to solutions. The authors write: “Our survey results imply that enlisting celebrities to promote American family life may work—celebrity fertility really is associated with the fertility of fans.”

They suggest governments and cultural influencers could encourage popular figures to marry and have children, or at minimum celebrate family formation publicly. The effect wouldn’t be magic, but it would be measurable.

Imagine more high-profile women and couples doing what Palvin did: showing up visibly pregnant, proud, beautiful, and married. Imagine more stars posting about the beauty and chaos of multiple children the way they already post about their pets, beauty products, or workouts. Imagine the same platforms that glamorize child-free luxury also glamorizing the decision to have three kids before 35.

The report is clear that culture and policy must work together. It outlines practical pronatal policies like generous baby bonuses that could be funded with less than 1% of the federal budget, family tax reforms, and more that are fiscally responsible compared with some of the massive childcare or leave expansions being proposed. But the authors emphasize that financial support alone won’t close the gap if the surrounding culture keeps signaling that family formation is a “burden or a downgrade.

Celebrities Won’t Save Us, But They Can Help Lead

No single group of famous people can reverse decades of cultural and economic changes, but they don’t have to. They only need to stop actively working against the desires most Americans already have and start modeling the life so many crave.

When a beautiful, successful woman chooses visible partnership and motherhood, it gives permission. When a high-profile couple celebrates their growing family instead of their freedom from one, it rewires what “having it all” looks like. 

Women are watching. They’re deciding what kind of life feels possible and worth pursuing. Right now, too many are absorbing the message that the highest-status path involves delaying or minimizing family. The data says that message is misaligned with what they actually want.

When a high-profile couple celebrates their growing family instead of their freedom from one, it rewires what “having it all” looks like. 

Barbara Palvin didn’t set out to solve the fertility crisis. Taylor Swift didn’t either. But both, in their own ways, reminded millions of women that love, marriage, and children can still look glamorous, joyful, and aspirational.

If more celebrities used even a fraction of their influence to make that vision feel normal again, rather than niche or regressive, we might finally start closing the gap between the families Americans say they want and the ones they’re actually having.

The demographic dead end isn’t inevitable. The research shows Americans still want children; they just need a culture (and visible role models) that makes choosing family feel like the winning move it once was.

Celebrities helped write the current cultural narratives. They could help rewrite them. The question is whether enough of them will recognize the societal power and responsibility they have and use it wisely.