After Years Of Denying The Deep State Exists, The New York Times Admits It's Real And Calls It "Awesome"
The gaslighting continues: Just weeks after corporate media outlets debunked their own hysterical Covid narratives, The New York Times released a video titled "The Deep State is Real, and It's Kind of Awesome" after insisting for years that the Deep State doesn't exist.
In an intriguing turn of events, The New York Times, a publication known for its rigorous journalism (I'm kidding), has shifted its stance on the "Deep State," a term used to describe a corrupt group of politicians and other influential people who pursue their own interests at the expense of the American people.
After labeling anyone who even referenced the Deep State a right-wing conspiracy theorist for years, the Times has now not only acknowledged its existence but also labeled it as "awesome."
The video depicted brief interviews with individuals working at the Environmental Protection Agency, the Marshall Space Flight Center, and other U.S. government agencies. The video urged Americans that they should support this "deep state."
"When we hear ‘deep state,’ instead of recoiling, we should rally. We should think about the workers otherwise known as our public servants, the everyday superheroes who wake up ready to dedicate their careers and their lives to serving us."
"These are the Americans we employ. Even though their work is often invisible, it makes our lives better," the article declared, before warning that Trump plans on getting rid of many of these individuals if he returns to the White House.
"But if Donald Trump is re-elected and enacts Schedule F, that could change," the video stated, referring to the classification status that would make it easier to fire government workers as political appointees. "He would have the power to eviscerate the so-called deep state and replace our public servants with people who work for him, not us."
Of course, the video didn't acknowledge any of the blatant, ongoing examples of corruption currently taking place within the government. Instead, it left viewers with a picture of the Deep State as some kind of benign group of hard-working employees.
The depiction is nonsensical for many reasons, but especially given the obvious implications of the term "Deep State." A hardworking government employee, committed to public service, operates within the bounds of accountability, ethics, and oversight. In contrast, an agent of the Deep State makes decisions made without public scrutiny or democratic oversight.
This distinction matters because it touches upon the foundational principles of transparency and accountability in governance...something the New York Times only pretends to care about given their willingness to work in tandem with Democrat politicians to craft narratives that best suit the party's interests.
Many on X are pointing out the pattern of misinformation and gaslighting that's been used by corporate media for years, and, at this point, it's pretty hard to ignore.
Based on previous instances of similar propaganda from the NYT, it does appear this "change of heart" is likely an attempt to normalize the concept of the Deep State and persuade Americans that we need it.
The fact that they switched to this strategy rather than simply denying its existence means that either too many people have woken up to government corruption, or that they have a new government-expanding scheme in the works for 2024.
Evie deserves to be heard. Support our cause and help women reclaim their femininity by subscribing today.